Other stuff I do
Stuff I read
« Lawsuit against state Democratic Party | Main | DNC files motion to intervene in at-large precincts case »
TrackBack
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341c303953ef00e54ff23f5c8834
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference The state law vs. the Democratic delegate plan:
Comments
Verify your Comment
Previewing your Comment
This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment
As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.
Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.
Recent Posts
- DNC files motion to intervene in at-large precincts case
- The state law vs. the Democratic delegate plan
- Lawsuit against state Democratic Party
- They got these printed quickly
- The Culinary endorses Barack Obama
- Buckley news conference
- Halverson charges
- Now all they need is the money to qualify it
- Gamers challenge Waters tax petitions
- Heidi ho!
Hi. Please keep us posted on this and whether there is any connection to the Clinton Campaign. If there is it is noteworthy. Thanks. S from NYC and Boulder City
Posted by: Stephen Rose | January 14, 2008 at 01:30 PM
I don't understand their claim. Their argument is based on it being an election, but Secretary Miller in a LVRJ article the other day said a caucus is not an election. He said this in the context of who can take time work under Nevada law to vote in an election. Therefore if a worker can't take time off under the law to go vote because it isn't an election, then setting up At-large precincts should be okay under the law. Thus their argument fails to state a claim to be litigated.
Posted by: UNLVStud | January 14, 2008 at 11:08 PM
Frivalous
Posted by: | January 16, 2008 at 01:08 PM